WHY REPORT EVERY INCIDENT OF CHEATING OR PLAGARISM TO STUDENT JUDICIAL AFFAIRS?
All incidents of academic honesty should be reported to Student Judicial Affairs because:
WHAT SANCTION SHOULD YOU IMPOSE FOR AN ACADEMIC HONESTY VIOLATION?
The value that the University of Florida places on education should be reflected in our response to academic dishonesty. In the absence of mitigating factors, we recommend that a grade penalty for the course should be the minimum appropriate response for deliberate violations. An appropriate supplement to the grade penalty you impose may be a referral to an educational or ethics seminar, all of which may be arranged through our office. If it is a second offense, suspension or expulsion could be considered as a sanction. This type of sanction can only be pursued through the University of Florida’s judicial system.
It does not violate state or federal confidentiality laws to discuss the student’s case with the judicial affairs staff or your department chair or dean. It would violate confidentiality; however, to reveal the charged student’s name, charges, sanction imposed to other students, instructors/faculty, or staff. You can seek the advice of colleagues about the nature of the incident without using the name of the student. It would also be helpful to discuss cheating, in general terms, with the class at the beginning of each semester.
WHAT HAPPENS TO THIS FORM UPON COMPLETION?
The form becomes part of the student’s disciplinary file, which is kept in Student Judicial Affairs for nine years from the year of the student’s matriculation and then destroyed (unless there is a suspension or expulsion). The student’s disciplinary file is subject to the same laws as other educational records, as this information can only be released within the University to those with a legitimate educational need to know. Any information can not be released outside without the student’s permission. No notation of academic dishonesty appears on the printed academic transcript.
WHAT IF THERE IS A DISAGREEMENT WITH THE STUDENT OVER THIS ALLEGATION?
In resolving a disputed case of academic dishonesty, the student and instructor must be treated fairly. This means that:
If it is apparent to us that your suspicions are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, a student’s meeting with us may clarify for him/her that a judicial committee will likely draw the same conclusion. This meeting may avoid the necessity of a hearing. However, the student may decide to resolve his/her case through a hearing. This meeting is not a trial; the format is informal.
ACADEMIC HONESTY PROCESS CHECKLIST